
Ulthera in Siam: Where to Go, How Much It Costs, and How Many Lines You May Need in 2026
-


When it comes to the Ulthera Program, one of the most common questions is:
“How many lines do I need to see results?”
Many people assume that the more lines they receive, the better the lifting result will be. However, newer treatment concepts are shifting the focus away from simply maximizing the number of lines.
Instead, greater attention is being placed on individual anatomy, the degree of skin and tissue laxity, treatment depth, and accurate energy placement.
One interesting approach is the Hi5 Protocol, published in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery – Global Open in 2023.

The Hi5 Protocol is an individualized approach to Microfocused Ultrasound with Visualization (MFU-V), the technology used in Ultherapy.
Rather than applying the same treatment pattern to every patient, the protocol assesses the degree of laxity and plans treatment according to the needs of each area.
Importantly, the goal is not simply to deliver a large number of treatment lines in a single session.
In the study, approximately 280 lines were delivered per visit across the full face and upper neck.
Treatment targeted two tissue levels:
Superficial Layer
A 1.5 mm transducer was used to target the more superficial tissue level.
Deep Layer
Real-Time Ultrasound Visualization was used to identify the deeper tissue anatomy and select an appropriate transducer to target the SMAS level.
This changes the question from:
“How many lines are being used?”
to:
“Are those lines being delivered at the right depth and in the right areas?”
Not necessarily.
This is one of the most interesting concepts demonstrated by the Hi5 Protocol.
Instead of delivering a very high number of lines in a single treatment, the study divided treatment into 3–5 sessions, depending on the patient’s degree of laxity and treatment requirements.
Patients underwent an average of approximately 4 treatment sessions, with around 280 lines per visit.
Following the treatment course, the study reported an average 1.7 mm increase in brow height, improvement in the submental area, and an 87% improvement rate as assessed by independent physician reviewers.
The authors proposed that this staged approach produced outcomes that were noninferior to a conventional single-session protocol within this pilot study.
This suggests that the number of lines delivered in one session is not the only factor that determines treatment outcomes.









One of the key features of Ultherapy is the ability to visualize tissue beneath the skin using ultrasound during treatment.
Skin thickness, fat distribution, and the depth of the SMAS can vary significantly between individuals—and even between different areas of the same face.
With the Hi5 Protocol, ultrasound visualization helps the physician assess the underlying anatomy and select an appropriate treatment depth.
The concept therefore shifts from:
“Deliver more lines”
to:
“Deliver each line to the appropriate tissue layer and treatment area.”
A patient with jawline laxity may require a different treatment plan from someone whose main concern is brow descent or submental laxity.
Even within the same face, different areas may have different degrees of superficial and deep tissue laxity.
Therefore, the number of lines, treatment depth, number of passes, treatment areas, and number of sessions can be adjusted according to the individual.
The key concept is simple:
Different faces. Different needs. Different protocols.

Not necessarily.
The Hi5 Protocol does not mean that 280 lines is the ideal number for every patient, nor does it prove that fewer lines are always better than more lines.
Instead, the study demonstrates that it may not be necessary to deliver a very large number of treatment lines all at once to achieve visible improvement.
Treatment can be individualized and, when appropriate, divided across multiple sessions.
It is also important to recognize that the Hi5 study was a small pilot study, with only 10 participants included in the final analysis. Larger clinical studies are needed before drawing broader conclusions.
The appropriate number of lines should therefore still be determined according to each patient’s anatomy, degree of laxity, treatment area, and physician assessment.
When considering the Ulthera Program, perhaps the better question is no longer simply:
“How many lines do I need?”
but rather:
“Are those lines being delivered to the right areas and at the appropriate tissue depths?”
The Hi5 Protocol reflects a more individualized approach to Ultherapy, combining assessment of tissue laxity with Real-Time Ultrasound Visualization to guide treatment depth, energy placement, number of passes, and treatment sessions.
Ultimately, Ultherapy should not be about achieving the highest possible number of lines.
It should be about using an appropriate number of lines, at the appropriate depth, in the appropriate areas, for each individual face.

Corduff N, Lowe S. Hi5 Protocol for the Use of Microfocused Ultrasound with Visualization. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery – Global Open. 2023;11(8):e5184. doi:10.1097/GOX.0000000000005184.